Right to Be Forgotten: Delhi HC to Hear on March 15 Doctor's Plea to Remove News And Journal Articles against Him
Right to Be Forgotten: Delhi HC to Hear on March 15 Doctor's Plea to Remove News And Journal Articles against Him
The petitioner, Dr Ishwar Gilada, stated that the articles are available both through the online platform of the publishers, namely British Medical Journal, The Lancet, NCBI, and Indian Paediatrics, and can also be searched on Google. His case is that he has already been discharged in the FIR that was registered against him in 1999

A petition for “right to be forgotten” has been filed before the Delhi High Court by Dr Ishwar Gilada seeking the removal of news and journal articles published on various online platforms pertaining to his wrongful arrest after a first information report (FIR) against him in 1999.

The doctor was accused of being involved in illegally procuring medicines from abroad and administering them to people living with HIV in India. It was further alleged that he along with others mishandled these patients, on account of which one allegedly passed away.

Due to the unavailability of Justice Prathiba M Singh on Friday, the matter has been adjourned for March 15.

The petitioner, Dr Ishwar Gilada, is said to be the first person to raise alarm against AIDS in India (1985) and to start India’s first AIDS Clinic (1986) at the government-run JJ Hospital, Mumbai. He is a globally acclaimed HIV expert, credited with bringing India on the AIDS control map of the world. He is the president of the AIDS Society of India (ASI), secretary general of Peoples Health Organization-India (PHO), and governing council member of the International AIDS Society.

The petitioner through advocate Rohit Anil Rathi stated that the articles are available both through the online platform of the publishers, namely British Medical Journal, The Lancet, NCBI, and Indian Paediatrics, and can also be searched on Google. His case is that he has already been discharged in the FIR that was registered against him in 1999.

The petitioner in his plea has relied on the trial court’s order of August 4, which stated that “there is no evidence whatsoever of the petitioner having engaged in any illegality”.

Justice Singh on February 17 noted that senior advocate Arvind Nigam appearing for Google LLC would place on record other orders related to the case.

Accordingly, the single-judge bench had said, “In the meantime, considering that the publications, which are online, let an email communication be given by the Petitioner to the publications, which are online, along with the copy of this petition as an intimation to the said publishers about the filing of the present petition. If they choose to join the proceedings on the next date of hearing, the following publications are allowed to do so; i. British Medical Journal, ii. The Lancet, iii. NCBI, and iv. Indian Paediatrics.”

The right to be forgotten reflects the claim of an individual to have certain data deleted so that third persons can no longer trace them. The right enables a person to silence the past events of his life that are no longer occurring. Thus, the right to be forgotten entitles individuals to have information, videos, or photographs about themselves deleted from certain internet records so that search engines cannot find them.

Read all the Latest India News here

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://tupko.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!